Thursday, February 9, 2012

False Flag

Greetings good citizen,

In a bad instance of ‘foreshadowing’ the headines are predicting a ‘positive reaction’ to another alleged ‘breakthrough’ in the yet to be settled negotiations over stupefying Greek debt. Which is to say markets around the world are currently down as of this moment.

How does that saying/advice go? Buy the rumor, sell the news?

How sad is it that the inability to distinguish between the two is the quickest path to insolvency?

But this is NOT today’s topic, no.

Today we return to the ongoing False Flag operation to give Anarchy ‘a bad name’.

Black Bloc adherents detest those of us on the organized left and seek, quite consciously, to take away our tools of empowerment. They confuse acts of petty vandalism and a repellent cynicism with revolution. The real enemies, they argue, are not the corporate capitalists, but their collaborators among the unions, workers’ movements, radical intellectuals, environmental activists and populist movements such as the Zapatistas. Any group that seeks to rebuild social structures, especially through nonviolent acts of civil disobedience, rather than physically destroy, becomes, in the eyes of Black Bloc anarchists, the enemy. Black Bloc anarchists spend most of their fury not on the architects of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) or globalism, but on those, such as the Zapatistas, who respond to the problem. It is a grotesque inversion of value systems.

Because Black Bloc anarchists do not believe in organization, indeed oppose all organized movements, they ensure their own powerlessness. They can only be obstructionist. And they are primarily obstructionist to those who resist. John Zerzan, one of the principal ideologues of the Black Bloc movement in the United States, defended “Industrial Society and Its Future,” the rambling manifesto by Theodore Kaczynski, known as the Unabomber, although he did not endorse Kaczynski’s bombings. Zerzan is a fierce critic of a long list of supposed sellouts starting with Noam Chomsky. Black Bloc anarchists are an example of what Theodore Roszak in “The Making of a Counter Culture” called the “progressive adolescentization” of the American left.

In Zerzan’s now defunct magazine Green Anarchy (which survives as a website) he published an article by someone named “Venomous Butterfly” that excoriated the Zapatista Army for National Liberation (EZLN). The essay declared that “not only are those [the Zapatistas’] aims not anarchist; they are not even revolutionary.” It also denounced the indigenous movement for “nationalist language,” for asserting the right of people to “alter or modify their form of government” and for having the goals of “work, land, housing, health care, education, independence, freedom, democracy, justice and peace.” The movement, the article stated, was not worthy of support because it called for “nothing concrete that could not be provided by capitalism.”

Here’s the ‘money quote’ “They can only be obstructionist. And they are primarily obstructionist to those who resist.”

The question, good citizen is if you think this ‘resisting the resisters’ bullshit is a mere ‘coincidence’?

These animals are NOT ANARCHISTS, Anarchy means ‘Rules without rulers’, so who are these ‘hell no, I will not obey’ morons?

They’re fucking Libertarians!

Why doesn’t the corporate owned media correct this, er, ‘misunderstanding’?

The corporate owned media doesn’t want you to even ponder the idea that you are perfectly capable of governing yourself. Anarchy would be a bad thing, a very bad thing for the capitalist.

As we can see from the article, ‘Black Bloc’ Anarchists also happen to be capitalists!

Now, think, think, think…who else happens to be rabidly pro-capitalist and anti everything else?

Who could it be?

Might it be those Republican wannabes, the Libertarians?

In fairness, they only put on their Republican faces when they’re trying to appear ‘respectable’ (and they come off looking like ‘the crazy uncle’ instead!)

True anarchists DO NOT support the exploitation of their fellow humans which means (true) anarchists DO NOT support capitalism BECAUSE it is ‘predatory’!

Anarchists hate ‘hierarchy’ and that’s what attracts the Libbies…they think this is the basis of ‘common ground’ between the militantly Libertarian right and the (largely clueless) anarchist left.

Communism is a hierarchy with the Party on top and the workers on the bottom. Now the commies promised that the Party/State would ‘fade away’…one day.

Took less than 70 years for that pipe dream to be proven false!

Civilization, by necessity, needs order. Nothing happens when it’s supposed to happen on its own!

So even (true) Anarchists ‘accept’ the necessity of ‘the state’, what they reject is the uneven playing field that the ‘usual suspects’ use to seize and then maintain control.

Understand, our ‘Hell no, I will not obey! Anarchists (Libertarians) will suddenly change their tune and become the preachers of conformity they were raised to be!

“Question not your lot in life for it is ‘God’s will’! Who are you to question God?”

(Said the man who claims to speak for God!)

This is another ‘conundrum’, True Anarchists are ‘usually’ atheists (or at least agnostic) I’m willing to bet these ‘Black Bloc’ pretenders all have Christian crosses dangling from gold chains around their blessed necks!

I have no evidence so I’m just speculating here…although it fits, doesn’t it?

Whose head is filled with more nonsense than a ‘believers’?

Not exactly a rewarding task but somebody needs to set the score straight or you’ll all falsely believe that anarchy is a bad thing and, worse, that capitalism is a ‘good thing!’

Thanks for letting me inside your head,


No comments:

Post a Comment