Friday, March 12, 2010

2B or not 2B?

Greetings good citizen,

Do you ever wonder about where you’ll be when civilization comes unglued? When I was working in town the thought crossed my mind quite a bit, along with the logistics of how I’d navigate the roughly 40 miles to return home…safely.

Did I mention driving executive sedan is fairly boring work? I used to chew through novels like nobody’s business. If you have nothing to read you’d end up playing mental games like how the hell would I get out of here (without getting killed by some panicked asshole.)

Yeah, when the shit hits being ‘out and about’ has its pluses and its minuses. To the plus side, you’ll be the first to know that civil order is dangling by a thread…to the minus side, you may not survive that knowledge!

Which is to point out that you will definitely be ‘somewhere’ when revolution breaks out and it behooves you to have your wits about you regardless of when/where it happens.

Um, unlike tonight’s offering the revolt will likely begin with a ‘public service announcement’ along the lines of the implementation of the Patriot Act. The message will probably be something along the lines of a ‘change in management’ in Washington and for everybody to remain calm, everything is ‘under control’.

Th Feds have been seizing weapons stashes for centuries so we aren’t going to see a repeat of the catalyst that sparked the original revolution.

Understand good citizen, you probably won’t get ‘sixty seconds’ to prepare, so having a rough plan already in your mind will work to your advantage.

Calling All Rebels

by Chris Hedges

There are no constraints left to halt America's slide into a totalitarian capitalism. Electoral politics are a sham. The media have been debased and de-fanged by corporate owners. The working class has been impoverished and is now being plunged into profound despair. The legal system has been corrupted to serve corporate interests. Popular institutions, from labor unions to political parties, have been destroyed or emasculated by corporate power. And any form of protest, no matter how tepid, is blocked by an internal security apparatus that is starting to rival that of the East German secret police. The mounting anger and hatred, coursing through the bloodstream of the body politic, make violence and counter-violence inevitable. Brace yourself. The American Empire is over and the descent is going to be horrifying. [Um, While the actual ‘takeover’ will be, er, ‘unexpected’, the lead up to that point could drag out for months, if not years. It will more closely resemble death by a thousands cuts than one swift, fatal strike.]

Those singled out as internal enemies will include people of color, immigrants, gays, intellectuals, feminists, Jews, Muslims, union leaders and those defined as "liberals." They will be condemned as anti-American and blamed for our decline. The economic collapse, which remains mysterious and enigmatic to most Americans, will be pinned by demagogues and hatemongers on these hapless scapegoats. And the random acts of violence, which are already leaping up around the fringes of American society, will justify harsh measures of internal control that will snuff out the final vestiges of our democracy. The corporate forces that destroyed the country will use the information systems they control to mask their culpability. The old game of blaming the weak and the marginal, a staple of despotic regimes, will empower the dark undercurrents of sadism and violence within American society and deflect attention from the corporate vampires that have drained the blood of the country.

"We are going to be poorer," David Cay Johnston told me. Johnston was the tax reporter of The New York Times for 13 years and has written on how the corporate state rigged the system against us. He is the author of "Free Lunch: How the Wealthiest Americans Enrich Themselves at Government Expense and Stick You With the Bill," a book about hidden subsidies, rigged markets and corporate socialism. "Health care is going to eat up more and more of our income. We are going to have less and less for other things. We are going to have some huge disasters sooner or later caused by our failure to invest. Dams and bridges will break. Buildings will collapse. There are water mains that are 25 to 50 feet wide. There will be huge infrastructure disasters. Our intellectual resources are in decline. We are failing to educate young people and instill in them rigor. We are going to continue to pour money into the military. I think it is possible, I do not say it is probable, that we will have a revolution, a civil war that will see the end of the United States of America."

"If we see the end of this country it will come from the right and our failure to provide people with the basic necessities of life," said Johnston. "Revolutions occur when young men see the present as worse than the unknown future. We are not there. But it will not take a lot to get there. The politicians running for office who are denigrating the government, who are saying there are traitors in Congress, who say we do not need the IRS, this when no government in the history of the world has existed without a tax enforcement agency, are sowing the seeds for the destruction of the country. A lot of the people on the right hate the United States of America. They would say they hate the people they are arrayed against. But the whole idea of the United States is that we criticize the government. We remake it to serve our interests. They do not want that kind of society. They reject, as Aristotle said, the idea that democracy is to rule and to be ruled in turns. They see a world where they are right and that is it. If we do not want to do it their way we should be vanquished. This is not the idea on which the United States was founded." [Um, there is a way of running a nation without taxes but this can only be done by eliminating property rights and ending wage slavery. Appropriately enough, you won’t see ideas like this one implemented without a revolution occurring first.]

It is hard to see how this can be prevented. The engines of social reform are dead. Liberal apologists, who long ago should have abandoned the Democratic Party, continue to make pathetic appeals to a tone-deaf corporate state and Barack Obama while the working and middle class are ruthlessly stripped of rights, income and jobs. Liberals self-righteously condemn imperial wars and the looting of the U.S. Treasury by Wall Street but not the Democrats who are responsible. And the longer the liberal class dithers and speaks in the bloodless language of policies and programs, the more hated and irrelevant it becomes. No one has discredited American liberalism more than liberals themselves. And I do not hold out any hope for their reform. We have entered an age in which, as William Butler Yeats wrote, "the best lack all conviction and the worst are full of passionate intensity."

"If we end up with violence in the streets on a large scale, not random riots, but insurrection and things break down, there will be a coup d'état from the right," Johnston said. "We have already had an economic coup d'état. It will not take much to go further."

How do we resist? How, if this descent is inevitable, as I believe it is, do we fight back? Why should we resist at all? Why not give in to cynicism and despair? Why not carve out as comfortable a niche as possible within the embrace of the corporate state and spend our lives attempting to satiate our private needs? The power elite, including most of those who graduate from our top universities and our liberal and intellectual classes, have sold out for personal comfort. Why not us? [Because that’s not ‘who we are’, it is a huge mistake on the conservative’s part to believe that only they are willing to ‘fight to the death’ for what they believe in.]

[Beyond this point the article…drifts into the philosophical side of revolutionary thought…rather than cut it out, I’ll leave it intact so you may decide for yourself how ‘pertinent’ this is to your decision making process…]

The French moral philosopher Albert Camus argued that we are separated from each other. Our lives are meaningless. We cannot influence fate. We will all die and our individual being will be obliterated. And yet Camus wrote that "one of the only coherent philosophical positions is revolt. It is a constant confrontation between man and his obscurity. It is not aspiration, for it is devoid of hope. That revolt is the certainty of a crushing fate, without the resignation that ought to accompany it."

"A living man can be enslaved and reduced to the historic condition of an object," Camus warned. "But if he dies in refusing to be enslaved, he reaffirms the existence of another kind of human nature which refuses to be classified as an object."

The rebel, for Camus, stands with the oppressed-the unemployed workers being thrust into impoverishment and misery by the corporate state, the Palestinians in Gaza, the civilians in Iraq and Afghanistan, the disappeared who are held in our global black sites, the poor in our inner cities and depressed rural communities, immigrants and those locked away in our prison system. And to stand with them does not mean to collaborate with parties, such as the Democrats, who can mouth the words of justice while carrying out acts of oppression. It means open and direct defiance.

The power structure and its liberal apologists dismiss the rebel as impractical and see the rebel's outsider stance as counterproductive. They condemn the rebel for expressing anger at injustice. The elites and their apologists call for calm and patience. They use the hypocritical language of spirituality, compromise, generosity and compassion to argue that the only alternative is to accept and work with the systems of power. The rebel, however, is beholden to a moral commitment that makes it impossible to stand with the power elite. The rebel refuses to be bought off with foundation grants, invitations to the White House, television appearances, book contracts, academic appointments or empty rhetoric. The rebel is not concerned with self-promotion or public opinion. The rebel knows that, as Augustine wrote, hope has two beautiful daughters, anger and courage-anger at the way things are and the courage to see that they do not remain the way they are. The rebel is aware that virtue is not rewarded. The act of rebellion defines itself.

"You do not become a ‘dissident' just because you decide one day to take up this most unusual career," Vaclav Havel said when he battled the communist regime in Czechoslovakia. "You are thrown into it by your personal sense of responsibility, combined with a complex set of external circumstances. You are cast out of the existing structures and placed in a position of conflict with them. It begins as an attempt to do your work well, and ends with being branded an enemy of society. ... The dissident does not operate in the realm of genuine power at all. He is not seeking power. He has no desire for office and does not gather votes. He does not attempt to charm the public. He offers nothing and promises nothing. He can offer, if anything, only his own skin-and he offers it solely because he has no other way of affirming the truth he stands for. His actions simply articulate his dignity as a citizen, regardless of the cost."

Those in power have disarmed the liberal class. They do not argue that the current system is just or good, because they cannot, but they have convinced liberals that there is no alternative. But we are not slaves. We have a choice. We can refuse to be either a victim or an executioner. We have the moral capacity to say no, to refuse to cooperate. Any boycott or demonstration, any occupation or sit-in, any strike, any act of obstruction or sabotage, any refusal to pay taxes, any fast, any popular movement and any act of civil disobedience ignites the soul of the rebel and exposes the dead hand of authority. "There is beauty and there are the humiliated," Camus wrote. "Whatever difficulties the enterprise may present, I should like never to be unfaithful either to the second or the first."

"There is a time when the operation of the machine becomes so odious, makes you so sick at heart, that you can't take part; you can't even passively take part, and you've got to put your bodies upon the gears and upon the wheels, upon the levers, upon all the apparatus, and you've got to make it stop," Mario Savio said in 1964. "And you've got to indicate to the people who run it, to the people who own it, that unless you're free, the machine will be prevented from working at all."

The capacity to exercise moral autonomy, the capacity to refuse to cooperate, offers us the only route left to personal freedom and a life with meaning. Rebellion is its own justification. Those of us who come out of the religious left have no quarrel with Camus. Camus is right about the absurdity of existence, right about finding worth in the act of rebellion rather than some bizarre dream of an afterlife or Sunday School fantasy that God rewards the just and the good. "Oh my soul," the ancient Greek poet Pindar wrote, "do not aspire to immortal life, but exhaust the limits of the possible." We differ with Camus only in that we have faith that rebellion is not ultimately meaningless. Rebellion allows us to be free and independent human beings, but rebellion also chips away, however imperceptibly, at the edifice of the oppressor and sustains the dim flames of hope and love. And in moments of profound human despair these flames are never insignificant. They keep alive the capacity to be human. We must become, as Camus said, so absolutely free that "existence is an act of rebellion." Those who do not rebel in our age of totalitarian capitalism and who convince themselves that there is no alternative to collaboration are complicit in their own enslavement. They commit spiritual and moral suicide.

© 2010

Chris Hedges writes a regular column for Hedges graduated from Harvard Divinity School and was for nearly two decades a foreign correspondent for The New York Times. He is the author of many books, including: War Is A Force That Gives Us Meaning, What Every Person Should Know About War, and American Fascists: The Christian Right and the War on America. His most recent book is Empire of Illusion: The End of Literacy and the Triumph of Spectacle.

Let’s tackle this issue of the ‘meaninglessness’ of rebellion. If you listen to ‘their’ media we are under a steady, perpetual assault from Mother Nature, if Global Warming doesn’t ‘do us in’ then the earthquakes, floods, cosmic radiation…and the exhaustion of fossil fuels will.

So why ‘revolt’? ‘The End’ is right around the corner, why not just grab what you can and go for the gusto?

Because you KNOW the lying sacks of shit are full of it! They’ve been using this steady drumbeat about the ‘end of the world’ since mass communications were invented with the express purpose of preventing you from pressing for legislation to stop them from raping the planet!

This is the ‘downside’ of ‘protected speech’ legislation that fails to include a ‘truth’ qualifier. If we could only speak the truth they’d have to muzzle the lot of us; BUT the well-being of society depends upon timely and accurate information…and we often don’t have time to vet every ‘fact’ that comes our way.

So it is that we are bombarded day in and day out with all manners of ‘mis-information’, some of which is later contradicted…only to be contradicted again by those who want the public to remain ignorant…

One must admit it is quite useful to control the truth if you want to keep the masses ‘subservient’. Not only do viable alternatives to our corrupt capitalist system receive no media attention but the only alternatives that do get aired are the ones that have failed.

Which should prove that the biggest challenge to any government is preventing the corruption that causes them to fail…the corruption that is causing our current system to fail as we look on, absolutely powerless to do anything about it.

I guess the first stumbling block to righteous revolution is believing things can be changed for the better. If you don’t think we can improve over what we already have then what’s the point?

Understand good citizen, you’ve been told for years that what we’ve got is as good as it is EVER going to get…and some of you actually believe that lie!

Um, you gotta admit, the ‘brainwashing’ goes mighty deep. Most of us wouldn’t be able to function at all if we weren’t ‘convinced’ the way things are is the way they have to be…

And that’s the other ‘demon’ blocking our path. We’ve been taught to believe that it is wrong to even hope for change. If we change anything it will only get worse and we have all seen the evidence of this as our lives have circled the drain for the past forty years.

Um, not all of us mind you, just us ‘working stiffs.’ The ‘Uber-rich’ have been enjoying prosperity beyond anything ever experienced before this side of Heaven itself!

The bad news, they have been enjoying this at YOUR expense! And despite their protestations to the contrary…they DO NOT ‘deserve it’!

Yet another little ‘landmine’ to be wary of. This isn’t a ‘witch hunt’, it is not anyone’s intention to punish ‘success’…but we’d be perfectly justified to punish theft…and believe me what I tell ya, most of the wealthy got that way by ripping the paying public off!

It is bizarre that it is perfectly acceptable to question what constitutes a fair day’s wages while it is a scandal to wonder the same thing about those ‘most blessed’ by our society’s system of commerce.

I recently ran a piece that was ‘outraged’ over the ‘superior’ pay and benefits enjoyed by employees of the Federal government, yet you’d be hard pressed to see the same kind of ‘outrage’ expressed over the bonuses of Investment bankers…noooooooooooooo, they ‘earned’ that money!

Um, not to put too fine a point on it good citizen but…these greedy bastards want YOUR CHILDREN DEAD!

Is that ‘reason enough’ to believe we can change things for the better?

Thanks for letting me inside your head,


No comments:

Post a Comment