Due to yesterday’s funeral (My wife’s godfather) I was in no condition to compose a post last night.
Um, switching from that topic back to matters economic sort of grinds the synchros on the mental gearbox a bit…sorry about that.
Better now?
Let’s press on with tonight’s offering where a respected investment analyst investigates the ‘New Normal’.
This Time its Different*
By John Mauldin - June 20th, 2009, 8:49AM
I have often written that the four most dangerous words in the investment world are “This Time It’s Different.” If memory serves me, I have written several e-letters disparaging various personages who have uttered those very words, and gone one to confirm later that it wasn’t different. It almost never is. And yet - and yet! - I am going to make the case over the next few weeks that it really is different this time, with only a lonely asterisk as a caveat. What prompts my probable foolishness to tempt the investing gods is the rather large amount of bad analysis based on unreasonable (dare I say lazy or surface?) readings of statistics that is coming from the mainstream investment media and investment types with their built-in bias for bullish analysis. Normally, gentle reader, your humble analyst is a paragon of moderate sensibilities, but I have been pushed over a mental edge and need to restore balance. I anticipate that this topic will take several weeks, as trying to cover it all in one sitting would exhaust us both. It should be fun. But first…
Peter Bernstein, R.I.P.
Sadly, Peter Bernstein passed away at 90 years young on June 5. One of the great honors and privileges of my life has been getting to know Peter and his lovely wife, Barbara. Introduced at a small dinner five years ago, I have been privileged to share many dinners and meetings with him in the years since, soaking up his wisdom. Only a month ago, he made a presentation (by satellite) to Rob Arnott’s annual conference and was at the top of his intellectual game. His writing of late has been some of his best. Peter cofounded the Journal of Portfolio Management and truly was the dean of investment analysts.
He wrote 10 books (five after the age of 75!). I am often asked what books I would recommend for insight into the economic world. At the very top of my list has always been Against the Gods: the Remarkable Story of Risk. If you have not read it, then get it and put it on top of your summer list. Capital Ideas is also brilliant. The Power of Gold is a must-read. You can get all three in a set at Amazon.
Jason Zweig wrote a very moving obituary in the Journal and reminded me of a few quotes I’ve heard from Peter. “‘What we like to consider as our wealth has a far more evanescent and transitory character than most of us are ready to admit.’ He urged investors to regard their gains as a kind of loan that the lender - the financial market - could yank back at any time without any notice.
“Asked in 2004 to name the most important lesson he had to unlearn, he said, ‘That I knew what the future held, that you can figure this thing out. I’ve become increasingly humble about it over time and comfortable with that. You have to understand that being wrong is part of the investment process.’”
Peter and I chatted several times during the last year, and he continued to tell me that those who thought we were in for a typical recovery were probably going to be wrong. In private conversations he was very worried about the world, and added much wisdom to those of us privileged to sit at his feet.
Isaac Newton once said, “If I have seen further it is only by standing on the shoulders of giants.” In the world of investment wisdom, there is no shoulder higher than that of Peter Bernstein. Rest in gentle peace, my friend. You will be greatly missed.
This Time It’s Different*
Ben Bernanke’s career will be analyzed and written about for many years. But the one thing that has caused me the most pain is his bringing of the term “green shoots” into the investment lexicon. These may be the two most overused and annoying words of my investment career. Every possible sign of a recovery is anointed with the phrase.
Of late, there has been a tendency for analysts to see numbers or statistics that are “less bad” and interpret them as signs that we are in recovery or at least almost there. They glance back at previous recoveries and say, “Doesn’t this look like the last time? When such and such happens it means that recovery is on the way. We should therefore buy stocks” (or whatever). [No irony should be lost on the fact that those desperately seeking ‘economic recovery’ just happen to be in the business of selling ‘financial products’.]
That we are condemned to read such musings is part of the investment landscape. But that does not mean we shouldn’t take the time to look at what the writer of those words is actually looking at. All too often of late, I find these people grasping at straws or failing to understand the data.
My premise for uttering the heresy “This Time It’s Different*” is that the fundamental nature of the economic landscape has so changed that comparisons with post-WWII recoveries is at best problematical and at worst misleading.
As we will see next week, we are on a track that looks far more like the Great Depression than the recessions of our lifetimes. To expect a normal recovery cycle, whether it is corporate profits or lending or consumer spending or capital investment or (pick a category) is just not reasonable. This is a period that is fundamentally, in so many ways, different. And the recovery (and there will be one!) will also be of a different warp and woof throughout the entire world economy.
Let me see if I can summarize my thinking before we get into the reasoning behind it.
First, we are at the end of a huge cycle of increasing private debt that ended in an overleveraged society. The process of reducing debt and unwinding leverage is going to take a rather long time. It will not be the typical one or two years and then things get back to an ever-higher normal. We are, using a phrase coined by my friend Mohammed El Erian at PIMCO, on our way to a new normal. We are hitting a massive reset button on our economic world, taking us to some new and lower level of consumer spending, leverage, etc. No one knows what the new level will be, although admittedly we are closer to it than we were a year ago.
At this new normal, we will not need as many malls or factories or stores or new-car plants or car dealerships or any number of other things to satisfy the new normal of consumer desires. As an example, and jumping ahead to a statistic for one minute, capacity utilization is now approaching 65%. Anything under 80% is anemic. Does anyone really think that businesses (in general) are going to invest more money in expanding capacity, in the face of the lowest level of production relative to potential since the 1930s?
Pardon the interruption but as I have frequently lamented, economists are not ‘sociologists’. This becomes painfully apparent whenever you see predictions based on ‘human behavior’.
While I wholeheartedly concur with Mr. Mauldin’s observations, left unaddressed is whether or not the ‘glue’ of social cohesion can withstand the widespread disparities inflicted by ‘The New Normal’?
My quibble here is that both the 1990 and the 2001 economic downturns both reflected what is being described here as the ‘New Normal’…a ‘one way’ economic contraction that reduces employment opportunities for a greater number of people.
Worse, almost all of what has been passed off as ‘economic expansion/GDP growth’ was in reality just inflation that they claimed didn’t exist. (Because you couldn’t have it both ways, either the economy was ‘growing’ or you were getting soaked by inflation; guess which ‘explanation’ the government chose…)
Twice in a dozen years we’ve ‘suffered’ jobless recoveries while the ‘not in the labor force’ numbers have nearly doubled since 1995.
Each and every one of us needs a way to support our families and ourselves. If our system of commerce is (as it has been proven to be) ‘incapable’ of providing a source of income/a means to participate for every member of society, then that system must be abandoned as unworkable and outlawed as unjust!
Back to the article…
The savings rate has shot up from zero to 6% in just a very short time. It used to be 12%. It would not be all that unusual historically for savings to go to 9% or more in a few years. That means that consumer spending will drop by 9%. Since consumer spending was 70% of GDP, that new lower level will become our new normal. And of course, due to population growth and hopefully increasing incomes, consumer spending will once again grow from whatever that new normal will be. But it is going to take some time for spending to reach the level of our productive capacity of a few years ago. [A few years we don’t have!] We are going to have to shutter a few factories and businesses. [Understand what he’s saying here! The ‘pie’ will ‘shrink’ and if fewer people get a share, tough! It’s all good so long as they get theirs…screw everybody else! Understand good citizen that society has no ‘reverse gear’, going ‘backwards’ is so much of a non-starter that it’s ‘unthinkable’, put in its proper perspective, proposing shrinking the economy is that same thing as declaring war upon the ‘defenseless’ members of society because it is they who will suffer.]
David Rosenberg, now with Gluskin Sheff, offers us this insight:
“What really struck us in the employment report of a few weeks ago was the fact that the only segment of the population that is gaining jobs is the 55+ age category. This group gained 224,000 net new jobs in May while the rest of the population lost 661,000. In fact, over the last year, those folks 55 and up garnered 630,000 jobs whereas the other age categories collectively lost over six million positions. This is epic.” [See chart below.]
“Moreover, the number of 55 year olds and up who have two jobs or more has risen 1.1% in the last year, the only age cohort to have managed to gain any multiple jobs at all. Remarkable. These folks have seen their wealth get destroyed by two bubble-busts less than seven years apart … the Nasdaq nest egg back in 2001 and the 5,000 square foot McMansion in 2007. Both bubbles ended in tears … and so close together.” [Don’t ‘mis-interpret’ these numbers, older people are capable of working for lower wages because their expenses are lower…which isn’t to say that ‘Granny & Gampy’ won’t be replaced by the millions of ‘bankrupts’ the housing crisis will leave behind.]
As we will see, the housing market is going to take at least two more years to truly recover. [This is ‘wildly optimistic’!] Looking at one month’s data that shows housing starts up a few thousand as a sign of recovery in the housing market is, well, silly. Housing starts are anemic and the inventory of unsold homes is still at all-time highs (a ten-month supply) with more and more homes coming onto the market through foreclosure.
The multiple causes of the recession are not subject to a quick fix. Offering to pay someone $4,500 to trade in an old car for a new one is a rather pathetic way to try and jump-start consumer spending and the auto industry. [Prices on ‘new’ cars haven’t fallen and $4,500 pretty much covers ‘sales tax and insurance’ on a ‘new’ car.] Is it not enough that we will “invest” $50 billion in GM, while shrinking the company to a size where it will be difficult for profits to ever pay back that investment? [Especially when the most ‘lucrative’ part of the automotive market is ‘financing’ the sale!] We have to add insult to injury and borrow more money to buy cars. Care to wager whether GM will need more money within five years? (And by the way, I love my GM (Cadillac) car, and will likely buy another one at some point, so I wish them well.) [Hey, I ‘wish’ I’d hit the lottery for a hundred million but wishing and reality are two different things. Once again we return to the central problem, it’s not making the cars but paying for them that has put us where we are today! (Banks and finance companies make most of the money if this doesn’t ‘turn around’, those so-called ‘loans’ will never be paid back!)]
The “stimulus plan” was ill-conceived and not very stimulative. But the combination of the Fed and Treasury and massive monetary infusions has pulled us back from the brink of Armageddon. [Temporarily] But we are not out of the woods yet. There is much heavy lifting to be done on the way to the land of the new normal. [From what we’ve seen so far, there isn’t a lot of ‘incentive’ to go there because the ‘new normal’ is more for them and less for us. There is nothing in the ‘New Normal’ that alters this…]
Welcome to the New Normal
Secondly, my premise is that the recovery is going to take longer and be much less robust than any recovery since WWII. With unemployment likely to go over 10%, and with our new normal world not needing as much production of so many things, unemployment is going to stay stubbornly higher for longer than in any previous recovery. We are going to look next week at a very sobering report from the San Francisco Fed that suggests we may be for a longer than usual jobless recovery. [What’s this ‘we’ shit, investor boy? You got a mouse in your pocket? Sorry but this is just another ‘semantic meme’ like the boost we all get when they call the working poor the ‘middle class’. Understand when these ignorant fucks refer to the middle class, they literally mean those people earning more than six-figures! They aren’t talking about the tens of millions of two earner households that are trying to keep it together on roughly $40k a year.]
Thirdly, all this is going to affect corporate profits, especially for companies that depend on consumer spending. Those investors who expect corporate profits to rebound in 2010 are likely to be disappointed. (For the record, if you go to the S&P web site, analysts are projecting anywhere from a 40% to a 60% rebound in earnings for 2010 for the S&P 500. I would willingly take the “under” on that bet if I could find any takers.) I think whatever profit recovery that is built into the market at today’s prices is generous. It is going to be tough to get much of a return from traditional buy-and-hold equity index investing for some time. [And make no mistake about it good citizen, ‘buy & hold’ is precisely the ‘strategy’ your 401k fund uses! It totally blows my mind that not a single ‘institutional investor’ has been fired, much less prosecuted for purchasing toxic assets with funds they pledged to protect. Worse, the Federal Pension guaranty fund bought toxic assets with their holding ‘after’ it was widely known the assets were worthless!]
Fourthly, this is a global problem and primarily one in the “developed” world. I think we will find that much of Europe will be in a worse state of affairs than the US. If there are bright spots in the developed world, I tend to think they will be Canada and Australia/New Zealand. The opportunities are more likely to be in emerging markets, after they adjust to the new normal. [Is there some ‘short-hand’ hidden in this last remark? Will the ‘developed nations’ become so ‘unstable’ that investment there wouldn’t be ‘prudent’? Flipping that rock over we have the ‘same old, same old’, why invest in labor pools that ‘cost too much’?]
What this all means is that we as investors, entrepreneurs, managers, employees, and consumers need to adjust our expectations. [or, preferably, come to our senses!] For those of us in the US, this is complicated significantly in that we really have no idea what new level of government spending and taxation we will be faced with in 2010 and beyond. For one of the few times in my life, what the government does is likely to have a huge impact on the economy, as there is the potential for a significant shift in the very fundamental nature of government involvement in the economy. It is difficult to see what the new normal will be. [Conversely, Ilargi and my humble self have a pretty good idea of what is coming…and it ain’t too sweet.]
In Continental Europe, your new normal is going to be further complicated by an eroding banking crisis that is likely to put a real crimp in any recovery. China and Asia must adjust to lower US consumer spending. They have built too many factories to supply what seemed like an inexhaustible US consumer. They have to find new internal markets or face their own new normal. [The forces at work here in trying to ‘internalize’ their own productive capacity in Asia will most likely tear their society apart. Their brand of ‘State Capitalism’ is as corrupt as our own and will produce epic amounts of civil unrest.]
All that being said, at some point, perhaps as early as the third quarter, we could see a positive number for GDP, although I think it will be later. Part of the reason that we will see some positive numbers is that year-over-year comparisons are going to get easier to make. Last summer, when inflation was close to 5% and I was writing that deflation was the real danger, oil was rising from $40 to $160 and food prices were going through the roof. Now oil is back to $70 and so we get lower year-over-year inflation numbers. Over the last two years the price of oil/energy is up, but we measure inflation on a yearly basis. [Which is to say that there is the prospect of generating numbers that point to a recovery but there will be no basis in reality for a ‘genuine’ recovery.]
Housing construction was once about 5% of GDP. Obviously, the collapse of housing construction has had a rather negative impact on recent GDP numbers. But housing is probably close to, if not at, a bottom. Even if it dropped by another 20%, it would have far less of an impact on GDP at the much-reduced level where it is now.
It is similar with inventories. They can only drop so much, and eventually they get to the new normal and stop being a drag on the statistical GDP. We are not in an unrelenting death spiral. [Or so he thinks…I’m much less sanguine.] There is a bottom. It is like a person jumping out of an airplane. They fall rather rapidly until the parachute opens, and as they get closer to the ground they manipulate the chute to further slow the descent. [This, naturally ‘assumes’ you had a parachute when you were pushed out.] But until they reach the ground, they are still falling. That is the case today. The economy is still falling, but the parachute has opened. [IF you had one!] We are going to reach the bottom at some point. We will find that new normal. We just need to adjust our activities and plans around that new destination. [I think it is folly in the extreme to assume that the ‘new normal’ will be ‘acceptable’ to a majority of people.]
I truly believe we get back to 3% GDP growth and 4% unemployment at some point in the future, but it is going to be more than a few years, especially if taxes are raised as much as is talked about in some circles. But just as in the late ’70s, when the outlook was not very bright, things will change for the better. When asked back then where the new jobs would come from, the correct answer was “I don’t know, but they will come.” [Do any of you actually remember the mid 80’s? I never saw more lawnmowers in the back of pick-up trucks as I did then.]
It is the same today. There are whole new technologies and industries that are going to be created in the next decade. Entrepreneurs will respond with new innovations and businesses. Jobs that are not now on the horizon will spring up. [Um, things today are pretty much like they like they were then, note that Bozo picked the ‘70’s as his example because Microsoft was still an infant…where do you suppose our ‘next’ Microsoft will come from? What ‘new’ jobs exist today (besides ‘homeland security) that didn’t exist a decade ago?]
As a society, we are having to work through the excesses of a lifestyle that was propped up by ever-increasing debt and an out-of-control consumerism. That will happen in the fullness of time. But it WILL take time, and we need to adjust our expectations to account for that. [What meathead fails to acknowledge, never mind nod in the general direction of, is the near total lack of new investment here in the US. The last ‘bubble’ was housing because the only other one, the only one remaining, will tear our civilization up by the roots and that’s commodities. Our society will not survive (another) commodity bubble.]
Over the next few weeks, I am going to drill down into the data to show why recovery will take longer and to help you withstand what will be an onslaught of out-of-control bullishness over data that is simply less bad. Let’s start with a few easy targets.
The Three Amigos
In 2001, I wrote about what I called the Three Amigos that I watched to give us an indication of the direction of the economy. They were capacity utilization, high-yield bonds, and the (now-renamed) ISM numbers. Watching the direction they go gives us a good idea where the economy is headed. I have not written about them for years (as a trio), so let’s revisit our old friends. We saw above that capacity utilization is still in a cliff dive. For there to be an actual recovery, we need to see capacity utilization start to climb back up. That is not currently a very positive indicator.
Credit Spreads - Bullish or Bearish?
A number of commentators have been effusive about how credit spreads have “come back in.” And indeed, junk-bond yields have fallen. That is a good thing. Look at the graph below (courtesy of Tony Boehk).
Note that yields have simply come down to levels associated with recessions, and not with actual recovery. What happened last year is that junk-bond yields priced in Armageddon. Now they simply price in a recession and slow recovery. Could they improve more? Certainly. But the easy lifting is done. The direction is right. Let’s see how they do the next few months. If those yields keep falling, that would be a very positive sign.
ISM - Is Less Bad That Good?
The Institute for Supply Management released their data for May, and again, commentators were enthusiastic about the increase in the manufacturing index. Green shoots and other signs and wonders were all over the media.
The ISM is a survey of manufacturers about how their businesses are doing. They are surveyed on ten criteria, like new orders, employment, inventories, backlog of orders, etc. (for the full report, you can go to
http://www.ism.ws/ISMReport/MfgROB.cfm?navItemNumber=12942).
From these responses the ISM creates an index. An index number above 50 means that the manufacturing sector is growing, and below 50 means it is shrinking. At the web site above, you can get quite a bit of detail. It is quite true that we have come back from what was the lowest overall index number in 30 years. But we are simply back to the level that was the low in the previous two recessions. The ISM number is “less bad” and that is a good thing, but it is still a bad number. Yes, it is headed in the right direction. Let’s look at the actual chart. [Again, totally neglected here is how off-shoring proceeds apace and there are no plans on the horizon to turn this fact around. So the ‘new normal’ will be derived from some greatly diminished production numbers.]
Of course, as businesses adjust to the new normal, whatever that level is, year-over-year comparisons will start to be positive. Simplistically, if a business makes 500 widgets a month and sales fall to 300, they will likely report falling production and rising inventories. Over time, inventories will finally settle out as management adjusts, and at some point inventories and production will (hopefully) start to rise. This gets reported as positive. The actual numbers may be down from the peak, but the direction of the company is once again on a positive slope. [Again I would like to draw your attention to a number that WON’T decrease in our much diminished ‘new normal’ and that will be the size of the labor force.
It is utter insanity to ignore this critical factor yet these ‘analysts’ do it all of the time!]
When you look at the actual numbers comprising the release, the manufacturing part of the US economy is still contracting. Is it less bad than a few quarters ago? Yes, but it is still bad. The recent number is only slightly higher than the average for the last 12 months. We need this number to be above 50 to talk about an actual recovery in the here and now, as opposed to the future.
Contain Your Enthusiasm
Shipping containers moving into US ports rose by 2% in April, from March. That was cause for celebration in some circles. Buried way down, if mentioned at all, was the fact that compared to a year ago shipping is down 22%. And year-over-year comparisons have been worse for 22 months in a row. At some point, you get to a bottom. We find the new normal. But if the new normal is down 20%, that is a different-looking economy. [The closer I read this piece, the more obvious it becomes that the ‘new normal’ will be unacceptable…but that doesn’t make Mr. Maudlin any less right.]
This quote came from good friend Dennis Gartman:
“‘Stuff’ moves by air when it is needed swiftly, but we can compare year-on-year data to get an idea of the relative weakness or strength of the economy. At the moment, the data is still very, very weak. According to the data reported out by the International Air Transport Association, after having touched just barely under $60 billion in ‘07 and ‘08, this year the IATA ‘guesstimates’ that only $40-$42 billion will move into the US.
“We are effectively back to the levels of ‘00-’04 and we are well below anything since ‘05. Having reached its worst year-on-year comparison back in December of last year when there was 23% air-transported cargo moving into the US from abroad, these yearly comparisons have remained about 20% lower since. Inventories of ‘goods’ on the nation’s shelves remain high, and so long as that is true then we are going to see horrid, recessionary year-on-year comparisons in this very timely data.”
Dennis also looked at rail shipments: “Since the start of this year this year, when the year-on year comparison was a relatively tepid -8%, the trend has been steadily
‘from the upper left to the lower right’ on the charts. By March, the year-on-year comparisons were averaging -15%. By April, -22%; by May -25%; and now, after a week or two of June, they are -26%. This is not a trend to be tampered with; this is a trend of some very real severity, and for now we fear that it is a trend rather firmly intact. Thankfully, it looks back, not forward; but if the past is prologue to the future, the future still looks rather bleak. [And mind you, this ‘time frame’ coincides with all of the proclamations of ‘green shoots’. If it isn’t being shipped, it’s not being made or puchased.]
“Finally, there is a glimmering of hope on the rail horizon, and that is that the June figures, as they are compiled, are showing some signs of life. According to the AAR, ‘freight traffic on US railroads during the week ended June 13 continued to show signs of gradual improvement … [as] rail car loadings and intermodal were up from the previous week with carloads ”at their highest level in 10 weeks.”
Welcome to the new normal. It is a quite distinctively different world than that of 2006. Global trade is off 10% and there is outright deflation in many places. We will have lots of data to look at over the next few weeks as we explore the new normal, but that is enough for today.
Oh, I almost forgot. The asterisk on “This Time It’s Different*”? Human nature hasn’t changed. We are still driven by fear and greed. [Something that won’t change until we abandon the practice of allowing financial speculation to determine the fate of our civilization.] The business cycle has not been repealed.[although it easily could be.] Free-market capitalism will get us back (withtooa few new rules of engagement). What’s different will be the nature of this recovery. All the other eternal truths will remain. [snip]
So here we have a financial pundit go on for eight pages, telling his ‘peers’ that the ‘new normal’ consists of a much smaller economy than we previously enjoyed…not that many of us were exactly ‘enjoying’ being squeezed out of our jobs and our homes.
Perhaps the most disturbing aspect of this missive is how the most useless members of our society are perfectly fine with the idea that the domestic economy will shrink to the size where it can be down in a rather shallow puddle. There are other places to invest…which is how we came to be where we are today.
Simply put, returns for investors have trumped providing a healthy economic environment for the rest of society.
The economic desert continues to grow and none of these ‘investors’ give a hoot. The gated communities they live in provide them with whatever they need. If any of them are feeling paranoid, Blackwater offers ‘rescue’ services that will wisk them out of the ‘danger zone’ by helicopter, quickly and efficiently.
How many have taken Blackwater and their competitors up on this offer is unknown as well as raising more disturbing doubts regarding how the investor classes feel about their ‘membership’ in society at large.
How disturbing is it to you good citizen that ‘for a price’ you would be allowed to have mercenaries fly in and machine gun down your fellow citizens?
Because if you don’t have the money, you’re stuck fighting off the marauders on your own!
Marauders that will enslave you and take your children hostage, have their way with your wife (likely killing her if she resists) and stealing for themselves anything of value you happen to have.
Why will these marauders exist? Because the investors didn’t like the idea of investing in the ‘expensive’ here! They’d rather create jobs in third world cesspools while ignoring the cesspool they’re building here in their own back yard!
The ‘peaceful’ version of the ‘new normal’ will exist in places like the Grand Caymans and other Island retreats where the military will protect you and other ‘tourists’ that are the backbone of their economy.
Meanwhile, back in the ‘land of scarcity’, the ‘new normal’ will be somewhat more harrowing as the simple task of leaving your home becomes a gamble few will risk.
It will be an exercise in futility to go to the store because every third delivery truck will be hijacked enroute. Naturally, some entrepreneurial marauders will offer some of their ‘take’ on the black market, soon to be the only markets available.
Cops, sick of being bushwhacked, will either stop showing up to residential calls for aid of they will arrive with guns drawn, ready to shoot anything that moves.
It also spells the end of the ‘two income’ family as you won’t dare leave your home unprotected. The spouse with the higher income will have to risk commuting while the other ‘guards’ the shanty.
This, ironically, will create a lot of job opportunities. Kids will find work ‘transporting’ minor necessities for their neighbors, while facing the prospects of being hijacked themselves, depending on the ‘density’ of the marauder population in a given area.
Worse, the marauders are if nothing else, all about ‘security’…some areas will be ‘taken over’ by the local marauders…pray your area isn’t one of them because these people live by their own rules. A bizarre cross between the ‘Wild, Wild West’ and ‘the law of the Jungle’ depending on an ever changing ‘threat level’.
Have I ‘unfairly’ pinned this horrendous outcome upon the ‘investor class’? I’m sure they’ll think so.
Civil order is a very fragile thing good citizen, the only thing keeping your neighbors from breaking into your residence in search of food and valuables that can be exchanged for food is a ‘viable’ economy. Where the prospects of employment outweigh the probability of being jailed, which provides them with a roof over their head and some food in their stomachs.
If your neighbors are hungry enough, your presence becomes an inconvenience rather than a deterrent.
While your best bet during the coming hard times will be something akin to a community militia, understand that the desperate will be ‘uniting’ as well.
There are all manners of scenarios that will play out, as what passed for our ‘economy’ dies a stunningly quick death thanks to investors that failed to see the ‘benefit’ of investing locally.
So good citizen, are you ready for the ‘new normal’?
Thanks for letting me inside your head,
Gegner
No comments:
Post a Comment